justcrim : open access research || cases and materials

Twitter BrianCrime

    Around the Web

    2.02.2009

    goodbye exclusionary rule?

    Justices Step Closer to Repeal of Evidence Rule ... NEW YORK TIMES (BY Adam Liptak) - In 1983, a young lawyer in the Reagan White House was hard at work on what he called in a memorandum “the campaign to amend or abolish the exclusionary rule” — the principle that evidence obtained by police misconduct cannot be used against a defendant.

    The Reagan administration’s attacks on the exclusionary rule — a barrage of speeches, opinion articles, litigation and proposed legislation — never gained much traction. But now that young lawyer, John G. Roberts Jr., is chief justice of the United States.

    This month, Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority in Herring v. United States, a 5-to-4 decision, took a big step toward the goal he had discussed a quarter-century before. Taking aim at one of the towering legacies of the Warren Court, its landmark 1961 decision applying the exclusionary rule to the states, the chief justice’s majority opinion established for the first time that unlawful police conduct should not require the suppression of evidence if all that was involved was isolated carelessness. That was a significant step in itself. More important yet, it suggested that the exclusionary rule itself might be at risk....

    1 comment:

    Anonymous said...

    Employing all or many of these suggestions may help significantly enhance the grade of pictures you receive with the digital camera inside your every day life. Try out getting a photo or pair of photos with such recommendations right now and see what kind of difference you are able to observe within your pictures.Attack Your Anxiousness By Using These Straightforward Suggestions [url=http://www.x21w12w21.info]Gitutyyt[/url]